Lichess Studies vs Chessable: Which is Better for Learning Openings?
If you've spent any time trying to improve your chess openings, you've probably run into the same two recommendations over and over: Lichess Studies and Chessable. They're the two most popular platforms for learning and drilling opening lines, and players argue about which one is better like it's a religious debate.
The truth is they're fundamentally different tools that happen to overlap in one area. Picking the right one depends on how you learn, what you're trying to accomplish, and how much you're willing to spend. Let's break it down honestly.
What Each Platform Actually Does
Lichess Studies
Lichess Studies is a free, built-in feature on Lichess that lets you create interactive chess study trees. You can add moves, annotations, arrows, highlights, and multiple variations. Studies can be private or shared publicly, and other people can collaborate on them in real time.
Think of it as a digital notebook for chess analysis. You build a tree of moves, annotate the important ideas, and can share your work with anyone. There's also a massive library of studies created by other users that you can browse and clone.
Chessable
Chessable is a dedicated learning platform built around spaced repetition. You buy or access courses (some free, many paid) that teach specific openings through a combination of video instruction and interactive move training. The platform tracks which lines you've learned and schedules review sessions using a spaced repetition algorithm to help you retain the material long-term.
Think of it as a flashcard system specifically designed for chess moves, often paired with grandmaster-level instruction.
The Big Differences
Price
This one's straightforward. Lichess Studies is completely free. Always has been, always will be - Lichess is a nonprofit and everything on the platform is free.
Chessable has a mixed model. There are free "Short & Sweet" courses that cover the basics of popular openings, and those are genuinely useful. But the full courses - the ones with comprehensive coverage and video explanations - typically cost between $30 and $100. Lifetime repertoire bundles can run $200 or more. There's also a Pro subscription ($100/year) that unlocks some extra features.
If budget matters, Lichess wins by default. But price alone doesn't tell you which tool is more effective.
Content Quality
Here's where it gets interesting.
Chessable's advantage is professional curation. When you buy a course from a titled player, you're getting a carefully structured repertoire where someone has already done the work of deciding which lines to include, which to skip, how deep to go, and what the key ideas are. The best Chessable courses include video explanations where GMs walk you through the reasoning behind each move. That context is invaluable - it's the difference between memorizing "play Bb5" and understanding why Bb5 is the right move.
Lichess Studies' advantage is breadth and flexibility. Anyone can create a study, which means the quality varies wildly. Some public studies are brilliant - detailed, well-annotated breakdowns by strong players. Others are a mess of random variations with no explanation. You need to curate your own experience, which takes effort.
The key question: do you want someone else to do the curation work (Chessable), or do you want to do it yourself (Lichess)?
Spaced Repetition
This is Chessable's signature feature, and it's the main reason people use it. After you learn a line, Chessable schedules reviews at increasing intervals. You'll see a line again after 1 day, then 3 days, then a week, then two weeks, and so on. If you get it wrong, it resets. This is based on well-established memory science, and it works.
Lichess Studies has no built-in spaced repetition. You can practice the lines in a study, but there's no scheduling, no tracking, and no algorithm deciding when you need to review something. You have to manage your own review schedule, which most people simply won't do consistently.
This is actually a huge deal. Knowing an opening line and retaining it over months are completely different things. Without some form of systematic review, you'll forget most of what you learn within weeks. We've written about this in detail in our guide on spaced repetition for chess.
Customization
Lichess Studies gives you total control. You can build any repertoire you want, add whatever annotations matter to you, reorganize lines however you like, and import PGN from anywhere. If you find a cool idea in a YouTube video or a game you analyzed, you can add it to your study immediately. The tree structure is flexible and grows organically with your chess knowledge.
Chessable courses are fixed. You learn the repertoire the author chose. Some courses let you add your own lines (through the "My Repertoire" feature), but the core content is static. If the course recommends the Italian Game and you want to play the Scotch instead, you need a different course.
This rigidity is actually both a strength and a weakness. It's a strength because beginners often don't know what they should be studying - having an expert choose for them is valuable. It's a weakness because chess is personal. Your repertoire should reflect your style, your rating, and the positions you actually enjoy playing.
Custom Lines and Your Own Analysis
This is the area where both platforms fall short for different reasons, and it's actually why we built Openings.gg.
With Lichess Studies, you can build whatever you want, but there's no review system. You'll create a beautiful study with 200 lines in your Sicilian Najdorf repertoire and then never look at it again because there's nothing prompting you to review.
With Chessable, you get the review system, but you're locked into someone else's repertoire. Want to add a sideline you found in your own analysis? Want to include a tricky move order that works well at your rating? The platform isn't really built for that. It's built for consuming pre-made content.
This is the fundamental gap: no spaced repetition for your own custom lines. It's why so many players end up frustrated - they want the curation freedom of Lichess Studies combined with the retention power of Chessable's spaced repetition. If that sounds like you, that's exactly the problem Openings.gg solves: you build your own lines (or import them), and we handle the spaced repetition scheduling.
When to Use Lichess Studies
Lichess Studies is the better choice when:
You're on a budget. Free is free. If you can't or don't want to spend money on chess courses, Lichess Studies gives you everything you need to organize your opening knowledge.
You're building a custom repertoire. If you have specific ideas about what you want to play and you're willing to do the analysis work yourself, Studies is the perfect notebook. You can pull in engine analysis, annotate positions, and build exactly the repertoire you want.
You want to collaborate. Working on openings with a coach, a study partner, or a chess club? Lichess Studies' real-time collaboration is excellent. Multiple people can add moves and annotations simultaneously.
You're analyzing your own games. After a game, importing it into a study and building out the opening lines you faced is one of the best ways to learn. You can compare what you played with what you should have played and add the correct lines to your repertoire study. This works especially well when you're preparing against specific opponents.
You want to study specific positions deeply. Studies excel at deep analysis. You can explore a position's possibilities freely, add branches wherever you want, and build a comprehensive understanding of a specific part of the opening tree.
When to Use Chessable
Chessable is the better choice when:
You want a ready-made repertoire. If you don't want to spend hours figuring out which lines to play in the Queen's Gambit Declined or how to handle every response to the Caro-Kann, buying a well-reviewed Chessable course from a strong player gives you a complete, tested repertoire immediately.
You value video instruction. The best Chessable courses come with hours of video where titled players explain the reasoning behind every move. If you learn well from watching and listening, this is hard to replicate elsewhere.
You need structure and accountability. Chessable tells you what to review and when. If you're the kind of person who needs a system to keep you on track (most of us are), the built-in scheduling removes the willpower problem.
You're a beginner who doesn't know where to start. When you're new to chess openings, the sheer volume of options is overwhelming. A curated course that says "here's what to play and why" is more useful than a blank canvas where you have to figure everything out yourself. Start with the free Short & Sweet courses for openings like the London System or the Italian Game.
The Best Approach: Use Both (And More)
Here's what a lot of strong improving players actually do:
- Learn from Chessable (or YouTube, or books) to get the initial repertoire and understand the ideas.
- Build your working repertoire in a tool with spaced repetition - whether that's Chessable's built-in system for their courses, or Openings.gg for your own custom lines.
- Use Lichess Studies for deep analysis - exploring sidelines, analyzing your games, and working with coaches.
- Review regularly using whatever system keeps you consistent.
Whatever tool you use, the key is consistent review. If Chessable's daily review emails get you to actually sit down and drill your lines, use Chessable. If you prefer building your own lines and drilling them in a focused way, Openings.gg might be a better fit. If you're disciplined enough to manage your own review schedule (be honest with yourself), Lichess Studies can work too.
The Verdict
There's no single "better" platform. Lichess Studies is a superior analysis and creation tool. Chessable is a superior learning and retention tool. They solve different problems.
But if we had to give one piece of advice: don't let your opening study exist only as knowledge you acquired once. However you learn your lines - Chessable courses, Lichess Studies, YouTube videos, your coach's recommendations - make sure you have a system for reviewing them regularly. That's the part that actually determines whether you'll remember your preparation when you sit down to play.
Build your repertoire however works for you. Then drill it until it's automatic.